Hyperguides

Ophthalmology / Retina

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Michael Ip, MD Carmen A. Puliafito, MD, MBA
Article


Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of central vision loss in persons older than 50 years of age in developed countries. The incidence of AMD increases after age 50 with approximately one third of people over the age of 90 affected. There are two clinical forms of AMD: neovascular AMD (Slides 1A,1B, 2A and 2B) and nonneovascular AMD. Although the nonneovascular form of AMD accounts for 90% of cases, the overwhelming majority of eyes suffer severe vision loss as a result of the neovascular form of AMD. The pathogenesis of AMD remains poorly understood. Genetic influences in AMD are difficult to study as most patients with this disease are of advanced age. Some families demonstrate an autosomal dominant pattern and a high degree of concordance is observed in monozygotic and fraternal twins. Nutrition has also been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of AMD but most studies have been inconclusive. Dietary supplementation with zinc, antioxidants, and carotenoids (lutein and zeaxanthin) may help to protect against severe vision loss in AMD but further investigation is merited. Elevated cholesterol levels and increased dietary fat intake have been suggested to increase the risk of AMD. Among other environmental factors, systemic arterial hypertension and cigarette smoking are associated with an increased risk of vision loss while increased ultraviolet light exposure remains controversial as a risk factor for AMD.

Clinical Findings

Patients may be asymptomatic or may present with blurred vision and/or metamorphopsia. Difficulty with dark adaptation and decreased reading ability are also noted frequently. Patients with neovascular AMD typically present with abrupt vision loss while patients with nonneovascular AMD present with insidious loss of vision. Drusen are a chief finding in the clinical presentation of both forms of AMD. Drusen represent focal, yellow excrescences at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Drusen may be divided into three types: hard drusen, soft drusen, and basal laminar drusen. Hard drusen are typically small (less than 63 µm in diameter) and as they are not age-related and are ubiquitous, they are not believed to be related to AMD. Basal laminar drusen are seen as uniformly sized, round, raised yellow subretinal lesions that appear semitranslucent on retro-illumination. The presence of basal laminar drusen confers an increased risk of neovascular AMD. Soft drusen are larger, typically greater than 63 µm in diameter and have poorly demarcated borders (Slide 3). These lesions are age related and reflect diffuse disease of Bruch membrane. Therefore, their presence is a risk factor for the development of neovascular AMD. Other clinical findings such as focal RPE, hyperpigmentation, punctate areas of RPE, hypopigmentation, and geographic atrophy (Slide 4) are characteristics of nonneovascular AMD that can lead to vision loss as a result of associated photoreceptor loss. Neovascular AMD is characterized by the development of

choroidal neovascularization (CNV). CNV can result from cracks in Bruch membrane, along with other ultra-structural abnormalities, that allow ingrowth of new vessels from the choriocapillaris. The ingrowth of these new vessels can lead to the following clinical findings:
  • RPE detachment (hemorrhagic, serous, fibrovascular)
  • Subretinal fluid and/or blood
  • RPE tear
  • Intraretinal fluid and/or blood
  • Subretinal fibrosis
  • Disciform scar
  • Intraretinal or subretinal lipid

It is the above features that are responsible for the majority of vision loss in patients with AMD. Neovascular AMD most often occurs along with features of nonneovascular AMD but may rarely occur without the atrophic changes of nonneovascular AMD.

Differential Diagnosis

  • Pattern dystrophy in the RPE
  • Stargardt’s disease
  • Best’s disease
  • Central serous chorioretinopathy
  • Bilateral juxtafoveal telangiectasis
  • Toxic maculopathy (e.g., chloroquine)
  • CNV from other causes (e.g., myopia, angioid streaks)

Diagnostic Features

Although the clinical examination can make the diagnosis, fluorescein angiography is useful to determine the presence and extent of CNV if it is clinically suspected. Two patterns of CNV are recognized: classic and occult CNV. Classic CNV is characterized by well-demarcated, bright areas of hyperfluorescence that can be noted in the early phase of the angiogram (Slide 5). Progressive dye leakage occurs in the later frames. Occult CNV is recognized to occur as one of two patterns: fibrovascular RPE detachment and late leakage of undetermined source. In a fibrovascular RPE detachment, areas of irregular elevation of the RPE can be seen on stereoscopic angiography and stippled hyperfluorescence is noted in the mid-phases of the angiogram. In late leakage of undetermined source, areas of fluorescein leakage with a pattern of speckled hyperfluorescence are noted in the late phases of the angiogram (Slide 6). The source of the leakage cannot be determined by the early phases of the angiogram. RPE detachments due to hemorrhage or fluid beneath the RPE also have characteristic features on fluorescein angiography. Hemorrhagic RPE detachments demonstrate blocked fluorescence throughout the angiogram study. RPE detachments due to fluid (serous RPE detachment) demonstrate well-defined dome-shaped areas of homogenous bright fluorescence in the early phases with persistence of hyperfluorescence into the late phases of the angiogram. Other ancillary tests may be useful in the diagnosis and management of AMD. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has been used, with variable success, to help better delineate lesion boundaries that are not well-defined on fluorescein angiography (Slides 7A and 7B). The ICG appearance of CNV may be classified as a hot spot (focal areas of hyperfluorescence less than one disk diameter in area), plaquoid hyperfluorescence (either well defined or poorly defined), or as a combination. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) may also be effective as an ancillary test. OCT can distinguish between the various types of RPE detachments, quantify the extent of retinal thickening, and image choroidal neovascular membranes in the subretinal space (Slide 8).

Treatment

Currently, there is no proven treatment or prophylaxis for nonneovascular AMD. Nutritional supplementation is being investigated as a means of prophylaxis. Laser treatment of drusen in eyes with nonneovascular AMD is being investigated as a means of preventing the development of CNV in eyes at risk. This treatment is still unproven and early studies have shown that the risk of CNV may actually increase with laser therapy to drusen. The Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that demonstrated a positive treatment effect with laser photocoagulation in eyes with CNV secondary to AMD. The MPS divided lesions into extrafoveal, juxtafoveal, and subfoveal lesions depending on lesion proximity to the center of the fovea. Based on MPS results, well-demarcated extrafoveal CNV should be strongly considered for treatment with laser photocoagulation. Well-demarcated juxtafoveal CNV should be considered for treatment with the understanding that there is a high recurrence rate for such lesions. Well-demarcated new and recurrent subfoveal CNV may be considered in selected patients. In these cases, both the patient and the physician should be willing to accept an immediate loss of vision following treatment with the understanding that long-term results are better with treatment. The MPS recommendations include only eyes with well-demarcated lesions. However, the majority (85%) of eyes affected by neovascular AMD present with occult lesions that do not meet MPS eligibility criteria. Furthermore, high recurrence rates and the immediate reduction of vision experienced by some patients make laser photocoagulation a less than perfect treatment. Therefore, a number of clinical trials are being conducted to improve treatment outcomes and broaden the treatment criteria for patients with neovascular AMD. Surgical therapies such as submacular surgery to directly remove CNV and macular translocation are under investigation but currently remain unproven. Angiogenesis inhibitors such as thalidomide are being investigated as adjunctive treatment to laser photocoagulation. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), transpupillary thermotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy are other investigational treatment modalities for the treatment of CNV associated with AMD. PDT is the most promising therapy, whereby photosensitive dye is given intravenously prior to treatment of the CNV with a low-level light source. Theoretically, subfoveal lesions can be treated with minimal damage to the overlying retina. Phase I/II studies have been promising and long-term follow-up from phase III trials is anticipated. Slides 9 and 10 demonstrate the dramatic decrease in leakage following PDT. In Slide 9, diffuse leakage is noted in the right eye of a patient with AMD. One month following PDT, there is a reduction in the amount of leakage shown in Slide 10.